Home
> Media
Relations > Mercy News Archive
Media Relations: Mercy News Archive
Contemporary Challenges in Gynecology
Presented by The Weinberg Center for Women’s Health & Medicine
at Mercy on Saturday, October 28, 2006
“Contemporary Challenges in Gynecology” provided
on overview of current clinical challenges in women’s health
care. It addressed topics for the practicing gynecologist, obstetrician/gynecologist,
primary care physician, and allied health professional. Topics
included breast health, cervical cancer, dealing with the difficult
patient, alternative medicine, endometrial cancer, HPV vaccination,
obesity challenges, urologic injuries in gynecology, and common
case dilemmas
The conference was held Saturday, October 28th, 2006 at the Baltimore
Marriott Waterfront Hotel under the auspices of Mercy Medical
Center and The Weinberg Center for Women’s Health and Medicine.
Dr. Neil B. Rosenshein, director of the Weinberg Center, led the
course.
Managing the Difficult Patient; Identifying the Litigious
Patient
Speaker: Maureen E. Burke, RN, MSN
Clinical Risk Management Consultant, RCM&D Insurance Brokers
Risk Manager, Inova Health System, Falls Church Virginia
Ms. Burke noted her background as a ER nurse and in risk
management: “All behavior has meaning.”
“What do you want from your visits today, what are your
expectations?” These are questions every physician should
ask of their patients. Typically problems arise with patients
who feel their expectations were not met. “They wanted something
and they didn’t get it.”
It’s important to be emotionally supportive of patients
who are grieving, anxious frightened or depressed and to “attempt
to stay on schedule.”
“Avoid criticizing other providers!”—This gives
the patient an opening for litigation.
Remain objective and humble; send a written summary of patient’s
visit to the patient’s PCP (primary care physician). “If
there are multiple physicians involved in the patient’s
care, be sure someone is managing their case…if everyone
is ‘hands off,’ patients can fall through the cracks.”
Make sure your staff and answer service aren’t rude, and
never guarantee an outcome.
Regarding the “difficult patient. One sixth of the patient
population qualifies as difficult.
“Your success and your patient’s success is dependant
on your interaction.”
The When and Why Patients Become Difficult…30-50 years
ago, the patient-physician relationship was informal. “The
doctor delivered babies and may have accepted eggs as payment
for the delivery.” The use of managed care has fragmented
patient’s care; patients may see multiple doctors; patients
are now more informed through the internet and various television
medical programs.
What causes a patient to become difficult? Anxiety, illness,
inappropriate expectations, have they been “labeled”
by physicians and family, do they have a generally critical approach
to things, and a high need for information.
“Today’s patients make informed decisions and often
seek out alternative medicine.”
The attributes of the difficult patient include acting helpless,
being demanding, violating rules, failing to cooperate with the
rules of the office, hostility, depression, anger, violence, non-compliance.
Problems can arise when the patient’s personal characteristics
come into conflict with the beliefs and values of the health care
team.
“Physicians will have their own value system. They may
not like dealing with substance abuser or the very obese. Female
patients can be particularly difficult as their emotions can be
more intense. It’s important that physicians not pass moral
judgments on their patients.”
Watch out for the patient’s transference, i.e. you or your
staff reminds them of someone from their past—remember,
“this is not about us.”
Similarly, patients can evoke negative emotions in physicians.
If the physician is a “type A” personality, a more
“laid back” patient may seem troublesome. There is
“counter transference,” where the “patient reminds
YOU of someone!”
Have a conversation with the patient and family. Remember you
can’t take care of everything; but you can help identify
something that you can help with; mediate and make compromise.
The Difficult Patient—Management Techniques
Don’t take the patient’s behavior personally. Identify
any conflict that has originated with you, your staff and the
hospital staff. Foster the patient’s sense of control by
offering CHOICES—“it’s all about control.”
Set firm limits for patients and provide consistent rules and
expectations. Remain objective—if not, you may miss vital
information that could lead to problems “down the road.”
Ensure a safe environment; install a panic button where you can
alert police and/or security. And “only as a last resort,
consider dismissing the patient from your practice. Keep written
notes about any incidents that may occur; you will have 30 days
to find a referral for the patient to a new doctor.”
Why DON’T people sue? “Few actually file lawsuits—why?
It’s related to how the doctor and institution handle the
event. Is there open disclosure, honesty, is the patient treated
with respect?” One third of litigants will sue if given
a reason and another third will sue “no matter what.”
“It’s interesting that patients and families will
remember EXACT conversations. It’s easier for them versus
the thousands of conversations you have had with patients.”
When people do sue, it is because of how they are treated, outside
influences of family and friends and even attorney’s advertisements.
Identifying the Litigious Patient
--patient with many symptoms (hypochondriac)…you may lose
objectivity given the patient’s tendency to “cry wolf”
--patients who have suffered trauma, have abandonment issues
--the narcissistic patient, who seek perfection, can’t accept
a bad outcome and need to blame the physician for the “imperfection”
--patients who have sued physicians before (you may wish to obtain
a legal history from your patient)
--the “doctor shopper,” one who goes from doctor to
doctor and doesn’t maintain a relationship with any one
physician
--the “high risk family”
“And we are doing this to ourselves---27% of people who
call lawyers do so following input from another health care provider.”
Why sue?
--doctor has deserted them 32%
--devaluation of patient/family 29%
--communication issues, poor delivery of information 26% (“so
work on your bedside manner”)
--failure to see patient/family’s perspective 13%
“99% of the time patient’s claim to sue in order
to prevent a similar event from happening to someone else.”
They believe there is a “lack of honesty, lack of apology…they
didn’t get what they needed.”
Other main themes for patients who sue are a desire to be compensated
and a belief in accountability—“our society is into
punishing doctors for making mistakes…we expect perfection.”
Physicians’ attitudes and poor communications constitute
69% of why patients sue.
“The biggest problem with communication is the illusion
that it’s been accomplished.”—Shaw
Keep in mind that an apology is NOT considered an admission of
guilt and can’t be used against you in court—SORRY
does NOT admit negligence.
Follow-up is very important when dealing with patients—document
your conversations, make sure informed consent is adequate.
Resolution of Claims…49.5% of claims against OB/GYN are
dropped; those that do go to court, OB/GYNs win 81% of the time.
The length of time from occurrence to close in these matters is
FOUR years. 13% of claims that 7 or more years to resolve, and
this “shows up on your record and hurts your ability to
get insurance.”
Remember, informed consent, disclosure and communicate are key.
Lawrence J. Cheskin, M.D., FACP
Associate Profess of International Health (Human Nutrition) with
the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
OBESITY: The #1 Preventable Problem in Gynecology?
Gynecologists are now the “first line of treatment”
in identifying obesity as it disproportionately effects women
and their ability to do something about it due to social pressures.
Two-thirds of U.S. adults are overweight or obese. Severe obesity
is rising faster than mild obesity, doubling in the past 10 years.
25% of children and adolescents are overweight and may have shorter
life expectancy than the previous generation, more than any other
time in history.
Obesity lowers life expectancy “by at least several years”
and obesity together with smoking lowers life expectancy by 13
years, so if you would normally live to 75, you’re dead
at 62. And worse, young women who smoke are continuing to do so
out of fear that giving it up will cause them to gain weight.
Four out of the eight top reasons for death are obesity related:
CHD, cancer, stroke and diabetes.
Diabetes has the biggest association to BMI (Body Mass Index)
as “you can never be too thin relative to your risk of diabetes,”
though the one plus of being overweight seems to be a decrease
in problems with hip fractures and bone density/osteoporosis.
You lower your risk of death by 20% by stopping obesity. Obesity
has overtaken smoking as the number one preventable cause of death.
Direct and indirect costs due to obesity cost us $117 billion
each year—that’s 9% of all U.S. health care costs.
Obesity is “the easiest diagnosis you’ll ever make.”
Men with a waist of over 40 inches, and for women, over 35 inches,
have abdominal obesity.
Evaluation of obesity includes a weight history; pregnancies,
menstrual disorders; diet history; history of other complications
such as gallbladder disease, CVD, DM, OA; and changes in physical
activity level. Other issues include “sleep apnea, which
is becoming increasingly more common,” drugs, family history,
endocrine issues, and smoking status.
Drugs associated with weight gain include steroids (BCPs, HRT),
tricyclic antidepressants; pheonthiazines, lithium, antihistamines,
sulonylureas, insuline, beta blockers and thiazides.
Genetics is important. Children of obese parents when adopted
seem to still have a high rate of obesity themselves even if adopted
parents do not.
Regarding childhood onset obesity; the first five years of life
are not predictive; only 21% of a cohort of obese individuals
36-years-old were obese children but 80% become overweight adults.
Treatments for obesity: diet alone has a “dismal long term
outcome…58% gain back weight even with diet, exercise and
behavior modification.”
What drives food choice? “Taste, cost, convenience.”
Portion size of food has been growing since the 1970s. Marketplace
portions now exceed standard serving sizes by a factor of 2 to
8.
Diet composition and satiety, what foods satisfy best. Protein
tops the charts followed by complex carbohydrates, simply carbohydrates,
fats and ethanol (ethanol may stimulate further food intake; liquids
are less satisfying than solids).
“You can eat 10 cubes of cheese and be full versus eating
a whole bowl of fruit to be full—but the cheese cubes have
1,000 calories, much more than the fruit.”
“There is no naturally occurring high fiber, fatty food.
Fat doesn’t mix well with fiber or water.”
The body can’t store protein or carbs, but fat is highly
storable—“you have unlimited storage” for fat.
Fat constitutes about 38% of our daily diet, versus 32% in 1911.
Meal patterns—Gorgers vs. Nibblers: actually eating 5-7
smaller meals during the day is more effective re: weight management
than those who eat 1-2 meals per day. “The body has a powerful
mechanism to prevent weight loss.”
Types of physical activity—non-exercise activity thermogenesis
or NEAT, i.e. incidental activity and fidgeting, can result in
burning 800 or more calories per day. Exercise is particularly
good for maintaining weight after losing weight.
You would need to cut 500-750 calories a day to lose a single
pound of fat per week.
Aspartame actually not effective, the body compensates for it;
“the energy compensation is nearly complete in the majority
of studies.”
Why do we eat? Due to habit, as a stress reliever, reward, boredom,
as a social facilitator, love, and “the mountain…like
Everest, because it’s there.”
Women often eat due to boredom and loneliness; social settings
increase food intake as we tend to eat 40% more than when we eat
alone.
Pharmacotherapy for obesity: Phentermine (the phen in Fen-Phen)
achieved a weight loss in patients of 8.1%. Other drugs (off label
use for obesity) include Topimax, Zonisamide and Rimonabant, a
cannabinoid receptor antagonist.
Surgical therapy for obesity—warranted in cases of patients
with BMI of 40+ who have failed non-surgical therapies. Gastric
bypass surgery makes the patient “food intolerant.”
“We have to teach patients to read labels. A muffin may
say it is 100 calories and fat free, but the serving size states
‘one third of a muffin.’ A 20 ounce juice pack says
100 calories per serving, but it is 2 ½ servings.
“The Obesigenic Environment”—we subsidize foods
that make us fat; health foods cost more than fatty foods. Patients
don’t come in for obesity prevention/evaluation or for other
screening tests because they have body image issues and “due
to messages sent by doctors.” Patients feel uncomfortable
and doctors fail to follow through. “Most doctors have a
feeling of inability to effective treat obesity.”
21% of doctors say they don’t want to do a pelvic exam
on an obese patient; 2% are uncomfortable examining a very attractive
patient and no doctors were uncomfortable about examining thin
patients.
Is obesity preventable? Yes and no…In theory, if you shave
just 50 calories a day, add a 20 minute walk, you can lose 5 pounds
a year—but we compensate for these changes.
We should see more changes in our schools. “Before we would
have physical education every day. Today it’s once a week
maybe and students often ‘just watch.’”
Tracy W. Gaudet, M.D., FACOG
Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Duke Center for Integrative Medicine, Duke University Medical
Center
Complementary Medicine in Gynecology
Categories of complementary medicine—alternative
or complementary now refers to anything not taught in U.S. medical
schools or offered in U.S. hospitals and “ranges from botanics
to crystal gazing,” and includes nutritional supplements,
herbals, physical manipulation therapy like work by chiropractors
and massage; hypnosis and stress reducing therapies; Reiki therapy,
“healing touch,” magnets; and those that are based
on complete systems like acupuncture and homeotherapies.
Complementary/Alternative Medicine (CAM) use in the U.S. According
to research reported in the New England Journal of Medicine (1990
survey), about 34% were using unconventional therapies with 425
million CAM related visits (vs. 388 million primary care physician
visits_
72% are not telling their doctors that they are using CAM. This
can be dangerous as in the case of the patient who is using estrogenics
(botanicals that have an estrogen effect) and you are prescribing
HRT (hormone replacement therapy).
75% of Americans have, at some point, used CAM according to a
CDC (Centers for Disease Control) study, and an increasing number
are using prayer specifically for health concerns.
“The goal should always be to have the best practice of
medicine—not just CAM or just mainstream medicine, not two
isolated worlds.”
Integrative Medicine: recognizes that good medicine must always
be based on good science that is inquiry driven and open to new
paradigms.
Therapeutic Opportunities: decreased harm of interventions; treatment
for conditions when conventional medicine fails; decreased cost
and improve outcomes; non-invasive approaches.
Therapeutic Challenges: huge market demand, lack of regulation
(what’s in the bottle may not match up to what’s on
the label), lack of education (in terms of CAM vs. conventional
medicine, “each side knows little about the other”);
refusal to be open to proven conventional therapies; lack of integration
“You often have health food clerks handing out medical/health
care advice.”
Women are the primary users of alternative medicine for issues
relative of menopause, puberty, pregnancy, and birth control.
Women more often than not see the gynecologist not for disease,
but for “life transitions.”
The best integrative medicine approaches are for dysmennorhea
and PMS, chronic pelvic pain, obstetrical care, surgery, infertility
and menopause. The best evidence of effectiveness can be found
with botanicals, oriental medicine (e.g. acupuncture), and mind-body
approaches
Consider botanicals. 25% of prescription drugs are plant-based,
and 60% of over the counter (OTC) drugs come from plants. While
botanicals may be regulated as dietary supplements in the U.S.,
they should be thought of as drugs.
The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA)
made it legal to make claims relative to a supplement’s
effect on the body’s structure or function or a person’s
well-being WITHOUT referring to the FDA. These products are easy
to recognize as they are typically marked, “This product
is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.”
With botanicals, “we not even know what the active ingredient
is and there may be multiple active ingredients.”
Visit www.consumerlab.com
for information from independent lab evaluation of products and
their quality.
Regarding Acupuncture. A NIH (National Institutes of Health)
Consensus Conference on Acupuncture in 1997, stated there was
“proven efficacy” relative to the effect of acupuncture
for post-operative and chemotherapy nausea and vomiting, also
for post-operative dental pain.
“Data for acupuncture are as strong as those for many accepted
Western medical therapies.”
One challenge is the concept of acupuncture as being “foreign,
with Chi and energy meridians…the fact that an acupuncture
point at the lateral aspect of the foot connects with the visual
cortex of the brain.” However, using MRI, when a light was
shone on the eye and the acupuncture point made in the lateral
aspect of the foot, the MRI indicated the equivalent activity
of the visual cortex in both cases.
As for mind-body approaches such a hypnosis, there are cases
of patient’s undergoing a c-section without anesthesia,
other than hypnosis. The “proposed mechanism of action is
decreased CNS adrenergic tone.” There’s a probable
wide range of health benefits of the relax-response effect, positively
impacting hypertension, arrhythmias, chronic pain, insomnia, anxiety,
and PMS.
Regarding the treatment of dysmenorrheal and PMS…Omega
3 fatty acids have been found to have many health benefits, and
can be found in cold water fish like cod, salmon, mackerel and
sardines. Flax seeds, one tablespoon, also a factor (high in fiber).
Vitamins and minerals, recommend 900-1200 mgs of calcium per day;
those who took calcium at this level were found to experience
an improvement of mood, less water retention and lesser food cravings
(a 48% decrease vs. 30%). Magnesium is also effective in abating
some PMS symptoms at 200-400 mgs; Vitamin B6 at 50mg per day resulted
in less pain, depression, mastalgia, but at levels over 100mg,
there were “neurological symptoms.”
Chasteberry is another botanical found to have some positive
impact on dysmenorrheal and PMS. In a study of 178 women with
a mean age of 36 years, found a decrease in irritability, anger,
headache, mood alteration, breast fullness and bloating (likely
chasteberry decreases prolactin secretions).
In a pilot trial for St. John’s Wort, found a significant
reduction of all PMS symptoms, 50%, in 2/3rds of women in the
study, but it may negatively impact the efficacy of birth control
pills.
The research for the efficacy of acupuncture for dysmenorrheal
is “promising, but further research is needed.”
Can acupuncture improve fertility? A study reported in Fertility
and Sterility medical journal found in a study of 160 patients
receiving invitro fertilization (IVF) and acupuncture, 25 minutes
of acupuncture therapy pre and post embryo-transfer, pregnancy
rates achieved were 43% with acupuncture, 26% without.
Can mind-body treatments, group psychological interventions,
play a role in aiding fertility? Fertility and Sterility medical
journal also reports that those in a 10-session cognitive behavior
group, vs. those in a support group vs those just receiving “routine
care” achieved pregnancy at a rates of 55%, 54% vs. 20%.
“This is a low-risk, low-cost intervention to raise the
rate of pregnancy.”
Can acupuncture relieve menopause symptoms? Hot flashes were
found to decrease significantly.
Acupuncture in breast cancer patients, regarding a pilot study
of patients treated with tamoxifen, with acupuncture patients
were found to enjoy improvement in anxiety, depression and somatic
and vasomotor symptoms; libido was not modified.
Mind/body techniques for menopause—hypnosis was found to
reduce hot flashes and improved quality of life.
Regarding botanicals and their use in combating menopause symptoms,
“the strongest evidence is for Black Cohosh which is “not
estrogenic, versus Red Clover, which is very estrogenic.”
One most be wary regarding obtaining botanicals as “people
who market these want to create proprietary blends” so you
may be getting something that has other items mixed in that you
don’t want or need.
Concerning CAM and surgical patients…looking at cases of
cesarean section using acupuncture for anesthesia (23 provinces,
1975-80 and 1981-87; more than 40,000 cases), enjoyed “success
rates of 92 and 99 percent, with blood pressure, heart rate, RR,
all stable throughout.
There are ways to integrate acupuncture with traditional medicine;
consider use of “relief bands,” a band worn on the
wrist which applies acupuncture pressure on a key point designed
to reduce nausea and vomiting “and there is a fair amount
of evidence that there is a reduction in nausea and vomiting by
wearing these bands.” Oriental medicine was found to help
prevent post-operative nausea and vomiting and was more effective
than placebo.
The use of pre-operative acupuncture reduced the need for supplemental
morphine by 50%; post operative nausea and vomiting reduced by
30%; cortisol and epinephrine reduced by 30%. Simply put, “relaxed
patients pre-op do better.”
It doesn’t cost much to provide acupuncture bands or headsets
with relaxation tapes.
There’s evidence that these CAM measures “even decreased
patient blood loss.”
“The greatest barrier to discovery is not ignorance, but
the illusion of knowledge.”—David Borstein
Should you see a CAM practitioner or a conventional physician
with CAM training? The latter physician usually requires no more
than 200-300 hours of CAM training, but for the “non-doctor
licensed acupuncturist, they require 2,500-3,000 hours of training.”
Ira R. Horowitz, M.D., SM, FACOG, FACS
Willaford Ransom Leach Professor in Gynecology and Obstetrics,
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School
of Medicine
Urinary Tract Injuries
“Does everyone need a cystoscopy?”
44% of urinary tract injuries are secondary to gynecologic procedures.
Ureteral trauma is the most common injury to the urinary tract.
One percent of gynecologic procedures are complicated by a urinary
tract injury.
Urinary tract injury accounts for 10% of all claims against OB/GYNS.
Prevention: place hysterectomy clamp close to the cervix; use
downward traction; if using endovascular staples, harmonic scalpels
or electrosurgical devices, be sure to check the bowel and ureter
proximity.
“When in doubt, do cystoscopy, sterile milk and dye instillation!”
Should you do cystoscopy after every hysterectomy—yes,
after every vaginal hysterectomy.
Sometimes it may be best to do nothing at all. In case of a pinpoint
fistula, it typically will close spontaneously without the need
for additional surgery…but if patient is still having symptoms
after three months, take action.
Kevin A. Ault, M.D., FACOG
Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emory University
School of Medicine
The HPV Vaccine: Where to From Here?
Cervical cancer is caused by the human papilloma virus
(HPV). Worldwide cervical cancer is a significant cause of death
with 250,000 deaths annually. In the developed world, most costs
associated with HPV are relative to detection and treatment of
pre-malignant disease; cost in the U.S., $3 billion. In the case
of abnormal pap tests in the U.S., over 10,000 cases had cancer
and 300,000, dysplasia.
Of the various types of HPV, HPV 16 causes cancer in 53% of cases,
HPV 18, 13% of case. Anal cancer due to HPV is now getting more
attention since the case of celebrity Farrah Fawcett.
Regarding HPV infection among college-age women, “in the
case of a couple hundred women in Seattle who had contacted local
clinic for birth control as they were becoming sexually active,
from the time of first intercourse the rise in HPV infection rose
from 20 to 50 to 60% in four years.
“Just about everyone who has had sex is at risk for HPV.”
Regarding vaccine for HPV 16, involves three injections over
a 6-month period, a similar dosing for treating Hepatitis B and
is “well tolerated. Women drop out, one for every thousand.”
In a phase II study using the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (for treating
HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18), it was found to be 96% effective, with
only two cases of HPV infection with the vaccine vs. 51 cases
with placebo after 60 months. In a phase III study with the same
vaccine, found to be “100% effective per protocol analysis.”
Question remains, how long will the vaccine last and provide
protection? Will it provide protection in HIV+ women?
Looking at research in how well the vaccine is being accepted
by the public…Parents want to protect their children/teens
so there is “generally a high level of parent acceptance
of HPV vaccine.” Vaccination of children is looked upon
positively. An important factor regarding their buy-in for this
or any vaccine is, “does it work?” That, and the severity
of the disease in question and the doctor’s recommendation
play a strong role in whether parents opt for the vaccine.
Cervical cancer, past and present: in 1930, cervical cancer number
one in cancer mortality in women in the U.S. In 1941, Papnicolaou
publishes his paper in the American Journal of Obstetrics and
Gynecology, fathers the “Pap” test; 1950, Fletcher
opens cobalt unit at MD Anderson; 2005, 500,000 cases of cervical
cancer worldwide; 2006, cervical cancer vaccine introduced. “This
is the vaccine prevention generation.”
ACIP recommendations for the vaccine, starting at age 11-12 years;
girls get other vaccines at this time, so may be best to do “all
vaccines at the same time,” even as young as age 9.
David B. Redwine, M.D., FACOG
Medical Director, Endometriosis Institute of Oregon in Bend, Oregon
Active Staff, St. Charles Medical Center, Bend, Oregon
Endometriosis: Modern concepts of pathogenesis and treatment
Excision is the only therapy proven to cure endometriosis.
Consider monopolar electroexcision which is possible with laser
and scissors. Electrosurgery, monopolar, may be unsafe and shouldn’t
be used at laparoscopy. Biopolar is the safest while the argon
beam coagulator really isn’t appropriate for endometriosis
and remains “a device looking for a use.”
How does electrosurgery work? Effect is either through vaporization—an
active electrode, causes water to boil, cells to explode and vaporize.
Coagulation is achieved by generation of heat which causes proteins
to coagulate, but this does not work for for endometriosis as
it will leave a crust of desiccated tissue behind as an insulator.
To perform monopolar electrosurgery safely, remember—short
bursts, pull tissue away from vital structures, use shaving strokes
(avoid pillowing), blunt dissection, traction/counter traction,
high power density for cutting and lower power density for bleeders
and use the appropriate power for the electrode size and shape.
John Albert Sampson, M.D.’s theory of the origin of endometriosis
was that it was due to “reflux menstruation.” In 1921,
speculated that peritoneal endometriosis was caused from leakage
due to ovarian endometriosis. Further theorized that the ovary
is the most common site for involvement re: origins of endometriosis,
because of its proximity to the fimbriated end of the fallopian
tube. However, the ovaries are not the most common site of endometriosis.
In 1922, Dr. Sampson modified his theory to say that reflux menstruation
through the fallopian tubes was the mechanism for the origin of
endometriosis. But consider that one out of 15 patients with peritoneal
endometriosis had blocked fallopian tubes—where did that
patient’s disease come from then?
Is endometriosis an autotransplant, that is the appearance of
the endometrium in other areas as though transplanted? Autographs
remain largely identical to the tissue of origin. Examples of
autographs include skin grafts, pulmonary valve transplants and
where the toe is substituted for the thumb. However, endometriosis
and endometrium are dissimilar. Endometriosis and endometrium
have chromosomal differences, different hormone receptors, different
adhesion molecule component, cellular invasiveness, histology,
morphology, etc.
Conclusion? Endometriosis is NOT an autograph.
Is endometriosis displaced endometrium? No.
How persistent is endometriosis, how often does it occur. There
are some risks of recurrence but not a high risk if you remove
all of the disease.
How do you judge cure? 66% were cured by laparotomy excision;
57% by laparoscopy excision.
Theories of origin: endometriosis is NOT reflux menstruation,
NOT an autotranpslant (note that endometriosis can occur in males),
and not caused by lymphatic spread.
If endometriosis is caused by blood, blood must travel by veins
to the heart and lungs so you should see endometriosis occurring
in the heart and lungs—pulmonary endometriosis “is
extremely rare.”
When endometriosis occurs in males, it is typically connected
to male use of estrogen therapy for prostate cancer.
Endometriosis facts: it does NOT spread geographically over time.
Extreme plasticity is required, and what’s most plastic?
Embryo. Endometriosis is embryologically patterned, determined
at conception? At puberty, estrogen makes endometriosis symptomatic.
By mid 20s, women have formed most of the endometriosis sites
they will ever have.
Dwight Im, M.D., FACOG
Associate Director, The Gynecology Oncology Center, Mercy Medical
Center
Adenocarcinoma in Situ/Microinvasive Cervical Cancer: Diagnosis
and How Much Treatment?
Today, we see less than 10,000 cases of cervical cancer per year.
Ten years ago, that figure was in excess of 13,000, so number
of cervical cancer cases in the U.S. is decreasing.
Cervical cancer accounts for 2% of cancer deaths in women.
Of the 500,000 women worldwide diagnosed with cervical cancer,
288,800 will die (by comparison, that’s 9,710 women diagnosed,
3,700 deaths in the U.S.). Cervical cancer is a major issue in
the Third World.
Cervical cancer symptoms include abnormal vaginal bleeding in
56% of cases, followed by pelvic pain/pressure (9%), vaginal discharge
(4%), abnormal pap smear (28%).
“It is a microscopic disease, by and large, and may not
have symptoms.”
Risk factors include HPV infection or other STDs; first sexual
intercourse at age 16 or younger; multiple sexual partners; presence
of other genital tract neoplasia; smoking, immunodeficiency or
HIV positivity; poor nutrition.
“If you can see it in an exam, it is no longer a microscopic
disease, which means it is later stage cervical cancer.”
The development of cervical cancer is progressive, “it’s
pretty slow, in 30-70% of cases may take 10-12 years” but
it can also be very swift in some cases, “in 10%, under
one year for appearance of invasive cervical cancer.”
A definitive diagnosis is needed by hysterectomy specimen or
conization, i.e. cone shaped biopsy from the cervix, but “stay
away from ‘cone biopsy’ term.”
You decide to do a hysterectomy—but what kind? In cases
of microinvasive cervical cancer, stage 1A, treatment options
include simple hysterectomy, conization, radical hysterectomy
and intracavitary radiation alone.
“Treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer is becoming
more conservative—conization and follow the patient closely.”
Neil B. Rosenshein, M.D., FACOG
Medical Director, The Weinberg Center for Women’s Health
& Medicine, Mercy Medical Center; Director, The Gynecologic
Oncology Center
Oopherectomy: Is it Necessary?
Is oopherctomy necessary, i.e. the prophylactic oophorectomy,
removal of benign ovaries. Currently, the rate of oophorectomy
is 38% in ages 18-44, and 78% in ages 45-64. With approximately
600,000 hysterectomies performed each year, in about 300,000,
the benign ovaries are removed.
Consider prophylactic oophorectomy as a risk reducing procedure
for ovarian cancer—“Begin using the term Risk Reducing
Salpingo-oophorectomy” or RRSO – as primary and secondary
forms of prevention. May be appropriate but only in the high risk
population who are those who are older, have a family history
of the disease and personal history of cancer.
“Patients who have a negative family history, their risk
is 1.5%, or put another way, they have a 98.5% chance they WON’T
have ovarian cancer. But patients with two or more first degree
relatives have a 40% chance of the disease (versus breast cancer
stats, 14%).
“So unless ovarian cancer is in your family, your risk
of ovarian cancer is quite low.”
Consider women who carry the BRCA 1 and 2 gene mutation—these
are women to target. In these patients the incidence of ovarian
cancer rises significantly starting in their 30s versus 50s for
those without the mutation. If the patient has BRCA ½ and
has had breast cancer, even greater risk of developing ovarian
cancer.
The risk reduction of developing ovarian cancer drops 60-95%
with prophylactic oophorectomy. Why not 100%? If the patient had
ovarian cancer going in (occult) or it was there and not detected,
and in cases of fallopian tube cancer.
“Do your pathology correctly. Never say ‘to protect
her from ovarian cancer,’ but will reduce risk, never eliminate
entirely.”
When should you do the procedure? Timing is important. The earlier
you perform the surgery, the less risk of developing ovarian cancer.
If before the age of 35, risk drops to nearly zero, while somewhat
higher for age 35-50, but a more significant increase of cancer
incidence over age 50. Also, with the procedure, allows a greater
reduction in the risk of breast cancer.
Recommendation? For women who are BRCA-1 positive, at age 35,
“that’s the time to talk about oophorectomy.”
For those with BRCA-2, can consider waiting to older age and take
into consideration patient’s desire to bear children.
Remember, ovarian cancer amounts for only 3% of all cancers among
women, 17.1 per 100,000.
“Ovarian cancer is a rare disease.”
On the “con” side, if oophorectomy or RRSO in the
premenopausal patient, that patient will now have estrogen issues
and need to go on HRT. There are concerns with HRT relative to
heart disease, stroke, osteoporosis and quality of life issues.
Further, estrogen replacement compliance is an issue as “nobody
takes their medications consistently as they should. If you had
perfect compliance and removed the ovaries and gave ERT, you have
longer survival than if you left the ovaries in.”
“If you do the hysterectomy and leave the ovaries, you
still get a 40% reduction” in the incidence of ovarian cancer.
“Ovarian conservation as a general rule until age 65; there
are benefits for long term survival.”
Conclusions: Primary RRSO in the BRCA patient is effective in
reducing incidence of ovarian cancer. Secondary RRSO conveys little
or no benefit in the average risk patient for ovarian cancer…plus
there are positive risks of harm by surgery and estrogen replacement.
RRSO “may not be the best thing for your patient. Rethink
some of the standards we have had for some time.”

|